The first thing we noticed about Nintendo's next console when we last got our hands on it was the length -- the Wii U is Nintendo's longest console yet. Sure, sure, there's a tablet controller and HD graphics and yadda yadda yadda. That's immaterial. What matters here, folks, is how the new hardware -- the console itself -- physically stacks up against the first Wii. As you'll see in our gallery, length is the least of the Wii U's changes: in the Wii U, Nintendo added two more USB 2.0 ports up front and rounded out its hard right angles, for starters. Around back, the port layout of the Wii is nigh-on identical with that of the Wii U, albeit with the fan moved an inch (or so) to the right, making space for HDMI output. This is an HD console, after all. Wonderfully, unlike even the most expensive models of Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, the Wii U includes an HDMI cable right out of the box. Not a huge deal, but it sure was a baffling move when Sony and Microsoft both skimped on such an important detail.
The only other change we spotted (outside of the power port being flipped from horizontal to vertical) is the lack of GameCube controller ports up top. Say sayonara to those old Wavebirds, as Nintendo's moving on to its new tablet controller and its updated Pro Controller. Take some super close-up looks at all the minute differences with us below.
My cigar friend charges $1,200 an hour (he?s a published author on International criminal profiling)
And I am on contract to three entities and receive $100,000 per contract although I don?t usually work more than 2,000 hours a year with each.
Then there are the ones just starting out who charge from $100 to 150 an hour.
but if you want bargain basement, an attorney who has been censured by the Ethics Committee will probably cost form $40 to $100 depending on how recent the violation is and for what it was.
Then again, if it?s a capital murder charge, add to the hourly billable rate any expert witnesses, preparation of exhibits, costs of investigations, documentation and other incidentals and your bill could reach from $100,000 to $1 million depending on the attorney and the complexity of the defense.
The texts today speak about love and marriage, reminding me of the theme song from the first Fox TV hit ?Married with Children.? Many of you would know it better as a Frank Sinatra song originally used by Frank Sinatra in 1955?for the television production of?Our Town, a play by Thornton Wilder.
Love and marriage, love and marriage,?Go together like a horse and carriage.?This I tell ya, brother,?you can?t have one without the other.
Love and marriage, love and marriage,?It?s an institute you can?t disparage.?Ask the local gentry and they will say it?s elementary.
Try, try, try to separate them, it?s an illusion.?Try, try, try and you only come to this conclusion:
Love and marriage, love and marriage,?Go together like a horse and carriage.
Dad was told by mother you can?t have one?You can?t have none.?You can?t have one without the other.
Quaint 1950?s sentiment, hardly reflected in a world?when according the U.S. Census only 48% of American households are married. The institution of marriage is an illusion for many,?As quaint and antiquated as a horse and carriage.?Today 20% of households are ?traditional? families, that is married couples with children.?We live in a world where broken relationships,?abused partners, divorce, and abused children?are as much the reality today as they were in Jesus? day.
The texts today are less about the institution of marriage and divorce laws, as they are about justice and love. Jesus calls us out on our selfishness, and our oppression of those who are powerless. In the beginnings of Genesis and the time of Jesus, women and children were considered property of the man. And marriage was between a man and a woman because marriage was a baby-making institution, it had nothing to do with love, it included multiple wives, and slaves because the survival of the small and fragile tribes and kingdoms of the time depended on it.
A divorce could be decreed by a man for any reason, he was bored, one of his wives burned dinner, bore daughters instead of sons, or wasn?t able to bear children at all, the absurd list goes on and on. And children were to work and support the household, they were property, they were not the center of parents lives. Children were to be seen and not heard and in the Mark story today, the disciples try to keep the children away from Jesus, because that was the custom of the day.
But Jesus calls out? men, the institution marriage, the practice of divorce, the disciples and all who push aside fellow human beings to the margins, from women, to little children. Jesus values all people, and while Jesus lifts up love and marriage, he lifts up love and the value of relationships most of all. Jesus calls us out to live in love, to live with a personal and communal responsibility that does not throw away relationships, regardless of who they are between, and above all, does not throw away people.
We are to welcome all. We are to value all relationships. We are called to lives of love and to lives of justice that work to defend all?the defenseless. The relationships of our lives are all build on love. We do not control, as much as we think, or would like?
Who we are drawn to in relationship;
Who we are friends with; and
Who we fall in love with.
Relationships? whether between similar ?two peas-in-a-pod? individuals, or two ?total opposites? are largely a mystery. What attracts us, what compels us to live life together as family, friends, or lovers, and what caused challenges, pain and brokenness in relationships are also often a mystery. But regardless of the mystery and messiness, we are called to relationship, to share our hearts with one another and with our God, who is love and desires nothing more? than to be in relationship with us.
Jesus calls us out on our idealistic views about what makes a perfect child, family, friend, partner, or spouse. Jesus calls us out on our hardness of heart. Jesus names our selfish, sinfulness that places self-love at the center of our worlds and disposes of others to the trash heaps and margins of our lives as hard-hearted. Jesus is not saying that there are not times when ending a broken or abusive relationship is needed. Jesus reveals that there is a place for divorce because of the hardness of the human heart.Broken relationships are always caused by sin, and regardless of who?s heart hardened causing the brokenness, that brokenness?is always counter to God?s creational intention.
God calls us to be in balance. To be in relationship with God (a vertical relationship) and one another (horizontal relationship). This cross-shaped living is not news, I?ve preached on it before? but Jesus focuses and reminds us of this way of life again and again.?Hardness of heart happens, but it happens less when we are in relational balance. Love, that mysterious and messy thing, good gift and challenging choice, is sustainable only when our hearts and lives are in balance with God.
Loving our God, ourselves, and one another is God?s will and way. It is shown through the ultimate symbol and sacrifice of the cross. Our creator loves us so much that God pursues us and comes to us. In the flesh God gave Jesus, God?s Son to live as we do,?to experience love and loss, and ultimately to die for us, so that all that causes our hearts to harden may be forgiven. That we may be given fresh hearts each day, cleared of our selfish, sinful thoughts and desires to love anew. And to guide our days, bringing the mystery and majesty?of love in all its forms, and God gives us the Holy Spirit of love that is God to stay in our hearts and sustain us each day.
There is no illusion, our God who is love,?accepts, values and welcomes all people softening hardened hearts with abundant mercy, steadfast love, and amazing grace regardless of who we are, or whom we love.
When our human bonds are broken, God gives us grace and heals us still.
When we confess our human failures,?God forgives us and grants us peace.
When we think we are not worth loving, God loves us and sends us new beginnings,?????????????????????? ????????? ???? softens our hearts and gives us faith, hope and love.
When you ?Google? yourself, what comes up? Your Facebook? Your party pictures? Your fashion blog?
Deanna Fry, a television producer at Indianapolis? WTHR, asked members of the IU chapter of the National Association of Black Journalists these questions at the group?s meeting last week.
In her talk, Fry, BAJ?06,? outlined suggestions for students navigating social media and ways to turn social media into a branding tool. She emphasized the importance of a strong online presence, even for younger college students.
?I don?t care if you?re a freshman or a senior, it?s time to start branding yourself,? she said.
Using as an example her own online presence on Facebook, Linkedin, Twitter and her websites, Fry outlined a number of tips.
First, protect your online presence.
?You are your best PR person,? she said. ?You have to protect your image. You have to make sure your image is squeaky clean. Whether you?re running for office or trying to get a job, you need to be that pristine on the Web.?
Second, Facebook is not for party photos.
?They should never exist on the Internet, because news directors and employers are Googling you,? she warned. ?If they see those pictures, sorry, no job for you.?
Next, create a LinkedIn profile.
?If you want to prepare for the business world, you want to have a site listing your qualifications,? she said. ?Complete your profile and make sure you edit it well, she advised.
Next, create your own website. You can create a website for free on a number of sites, including Word Press and Blogger, Fry said.
?It impresses employers and makes you more accessible to them if you have your portfolio, including your resume, in one central location,? she said.
Then, buy your domain name.
?It?s $10 on GoDaddy.com. That helps make you a brand,? Fry said. ?If someone has your name on dot com, you can get dot net or other suffixes.?
Create synergy with your professional social network sites.
?Have a photographer friend take a professional headshot of you and place it on all your social network sites,? she said. ?You should make sure that all your sites have the same identity.?
Fry ended the discussion by talking about the realities of the broadcast industry.
?Even now, in 2012, people of color have to strive to be better, much much better, than our colleagues,? she said.
She implored the group to think about positions other than being on-air talent. ?There are a number of positions in television,? the producer said. ?We need more decision makers of color. Reporters don?t make the decisions. Producers decide what reporters cover every day.?
Fry drew on her own career to encourage the members to get involved and to look ahead.
?I am the only black decision maker at WTHR; sometimes I lose,? she said. ?I want to see more African Americans, Latinos, Asians making decisions and controlling our image.?
?
?
Questions? Comments? Email the Web editor.
This entry was posted on Oct. 7, 2012 at 6:50 p.m. and is filed under News.
If you wish to get an enterprise online then you can do so using low cost web hosting that is secure, reliable and affordable. Website hosting is becoming more popular by the day as more folks resolve to start a web-based business. The alternatives that the internet maintain for every particular person is massive and increasingly people are deciding to research, learn and take motion to create successful on-line businesses. It all begins off with discovering an excellent internet hosting company that will be the base of your internetsite and the place your internetsite will live during your on-line adventure. Your internetsite is made up of different information that you just add to a server, that is where website hosting comes in.
When you?re selecting a cheap website hosting provider, remember to completely try what features and services the company has to supply before you decide to purchase a hosting package. Discover out what programming language it supports, how much bandwidth is allowed, how much disk space, etc. Many internet hosting suppliers will provide a 30 day a reimbursement guarantee. Using an online hosting supplier with an assure permits you to change your thoughts in the event you discover one thing higher or are usually not satisfied with their service. In case you are trying to host more than one internetsite, search for cheap internet hosting suppliers that offer multiple accounts for one price. There are various hosting suppliers that enable you might have one account with them and host multiple websites beneath that one account.
It depends on your wants are ? for instance if you want to sell or buy things and persons are about to rely on your site then you will have to spend slightly more, but when you?re going to use it to upload totally different stuff then you the understanding for low value hosting is different. It doesn?t matter what are you about to do, you possibly can take a look at our offers which can guarantee you stability of the hosting on affordable prices. They can match each budget so in case you are about to make an web site and you might be wondering what provider to choose ? use us. I?ve been an Web programmer for about 10 years now and in that point I?ve tried a number of web hosting companies for my ecommerce sites. Unfortunately most internet hosting provider were an enormous disappointment, some have been quite good for some months but after some time the service or uptimes grew to become horrible.
Be it massive or small, web hosting is an obligatory part of any on-line business. But choosing one of the best and cheap internet hosting firm is a tricky task. Although there are a number of internet hosting corporations obtainable who claim to supply the most effective companies at cheaper value, however you want to make sure of the one that you simply pick. Examine the numerous packages, companies and the costs too prior to finalizing any. You need to first make certain of all your business needs after which decide on the corporate that appeals to you the most. First scrutinize the providers offered in reference to your corporation needs. The web listing too has a categorized part that affirms a budget hosting companies.
With regards to finding low-cost web hosting, the online is a gold mine stuffed with fake gold. Most of those hosting companies on-line aren?t value your time nor your money. They provide poor service and package deal not match for a site that get over 200 visitors daily. once your site begins getting extra visitors, these internet hosting suppliers shuts you down and ask for more money. It is a fast catch for many who do not perceive what quantity of bandwidth they want, so that they bounce to the primary available low value hosting bundle offered. Many web hosting providers on-line are just resellers, they sell hosting from most of the well known hosting providers. That approach you end up paying more, and is obtainable smaller packages with minimal bandwidth allocated.
In conclusion, a cheap and reliable web hosting service ought to embody an inexpensive if not free setup fee. For most of these companies, that is very high. It also shows up in most free service providers. In the event you comply with the steps above, you should be capable of discover a moderately cheap and reliable internet hosting service in the market place. This isn?t different when beginning out as a new internetsite owner. But notice that your web hosting package deal is your real property online and must be handled as that of your own home or workplace most especially, the later. But it?s common sense to start out any line of enterprise in a small method, learn from expertise and make crucial modifications where relevant as time goes on. The extra high quality your hosting is, the more features, speed, and reliability you will experience but you don?t need to spend a fortune to search out the best provider.
Tip: To increase financial savings, at your convenience stop by Hostgator coupon and get the most up-to-date 2012 Discount Codes for Hostgator through the website here http://hostgatorcouponx.tumblr.com/!
Has the speediest pulsar been found?Public release date: 28-Jun-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]
Contact: Megan Watzke mwatzke@cfa.harvard.edu 617-496-7998 Chandra X-ray Center
Researchers using three different telescopes -- NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and ESA's XMM-Newton in space, and the Parkes radio telescope in Australia -- may have found the fastest moving pulsar ever seen.
The evidence for this potentially record-breaking speed comes, in part, from the features highlighted in this composite image. X-ray observations from Chandra (green) and XMM-Newton (purple) have been combined with infrared data from the 2MASS project and optical data from the Digitized Sky Survey (colored red, green and blue, but appearing in the image as white).
The large area of diffuse X-rays seen by XMM-Newton was produced when a massive star exploded as a supernova, leaving behind a debris field, or supernova remnant known as SNR MSH 11-16A. Shocks waves from the supernova have heated surrounding gas to several million degrees Kelvin, causing the remnant to glow brightly in X-rays.
The Chandra image shown in the inset ("X-ray close-up") reveals a comet-shaped X-ray source well outside the boundary of the supernova remnant. This source consists of a point-like object with a long tail trailing behind it for about 3 light years. The bright star nearby and also the one in SNR MSH11-16A are both likely to be foreground stars unrelated to the supernova remnant.
The point-like X-ray source was discovered by the International Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory, or INTEGRAL, and is called IGR J11014-6103 (or IGR J11014 for short). It may be a rapidly spinning, super-dense star (known as a "pulsar", a type of neutron star) that was ejected during the explosion. If so, it is racing away from the center of the supernova remnant at millions of miles per hour.
The favored interpretation for the tail of X-ray emission is that a pulsar wind nebula, that is, a "wind" of high-energy particles produced by the pulsar, has been swept behind a bow shock created by the pulsar's high speed. (A similar case was seen in another object known as PSR B1957+20 [http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2003/b1957/closer_look.html]).
The elongated emission is pointing towards the center of MSH 11-61A where the pulsar would have been formed, supporting the idea that the Chandra image is of a pulsar wind nebula and its bow shock. Another interesting feature of the Chandra image, also seen with XMM-Newton, is the faint X-ray tail extending to the top-right. The cause of this feature is unknown, but similar tails have been seen from other pulsars that also do not line up with the pulsar's direction of motion.
Based on earlier observations, astronomers estimate that the age of MSH 11-61A is approximately 15,000 years, and it lies at a distance of about 30,000 light years away from Earth. Combining these values with the distance that the pulsar has appeared to have traveled from the center of the MSH 11-61A, astronomers estimate that IGR J11014 is moving at a speed between 5.4 million and 6.5 million miles per hour.
The only other neutron star associated with a supernova remnant that may rival this in speed is the candidate found in the supernova remnant known as G350.1-0.3. The speed of the neutron star candidate in this system is estimated to lie between 3 and 6 million miles per hour (http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2012/g350/).
The high speeds estimated for both IGR J11014 and the neutron star candidate in G350.1-0.3 are preliminary and need to be confirmed. If they are confirmed, explaining the high speeds of the neutron star presents a severe challenge to existing models for supernova explosions.
One important caveat in the conclusion that IGR J11014 may be the fastest moving pulsar is that pulsations have not been detected in it during a search with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Parkes radio telescope. This non-detection is not surprising for a pulsar located about 30,000 light years away.
However, there are other pieces of evidence that support the pulsar interpretation. First, the lack of detection of a counterpart to the X-ray source in optical or infrared images supports the idea that it is a pulsar, since such objects are very faint at these wavelengths. Also, there are no apparent differences in the brightness of the source between XMM-Newton observations in 2003 and the Chandra observations in 2011, behavior that is expected if IGR J11014 is a pulsar. Finally, the X-ray spectrum of the source, that is, its signature in energy, is similar to what astronomers expect to see for a pulsar.
###
These results were published in the May 10, 2012 issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters. The authors were John Tomsick and Arash Bodaghee (University of California, Berkeley), Jerome Rodriguez and Sylvain Chaty (University of Paris, CEA Saclay), Fernando Camilo (Columbia University), Francesca Fornasini (UC Berkeley), and Farhid Rahoui (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics).
NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., manages the Chandra program for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory controls Chandra's science and flight operations from Cambridge, Mass.
[ | E-mail | Share ]
?
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
Has the speediest pulsar been found?Public release date: 28-Jun-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]
Contact: Megan Watzke mwatzke@cfa.harvard.edu 617-496-7998 Chandra X-ray Center
Researchers using three different telescopes -- NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and ESA's XMM-Newton in space, and the Parkes radio telescope in Australia -- may have found the fastest moving pulsar ever seen.
The evidence for this potentially record-breaking speed comes, in part, from the features highlighted in this composite image. X-ray observations from Chandra (green) and XMM-Newton (purple) have been combined with infrared data from the 2MASS project and optical data from the Digitized Sky Survey (colored red, green and blue, but appearing in the image as white).
The large area of diffuse X-rays seen by XMM-Newton was produced when a massive star exploded as a supernova, leaving behind a debris field, or supernova remnant known as SNR MSH 11-16A. Shocks waves from the supernova have heated surrounding gas to several million degrees Kelvin, causing the remnant to glow brightly in X-rays.
The Chandra image shown in the inset ("X-ray close-up") reveals a comet-shaped X-ray source well outside the boundary of the supernova remnant. This source consists of a point-like object with a long tail trailing behind it for about 3 light years. The bright star nearby and also the one in SNR MSH11-16A are both likely to be foreground stars unrelated to the supernova remnant.
The point-like X-ray source was discovered by the International Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory, or INTEGRAL, and is called IGR J11014-6103 (or IGR J11014 for short). It may be a rapidly spinning, super-dense star (known as a "pulsar", a type of neutron star) that was ejected during the explosion. If so, it is racing away from the center of the supernova remnant at millions of miles per hour.
The favored interpretation for the tail of X-ray emission is that a pulsar wind nebula, that is, a "wind" of high-energy particles produced by the pulsar, has been swept behind a bow shock created by the pulsar's high speed. (A similar case was seen in another object known as PSR B1957+20 [http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2003/b1957/closer_look.html]).
The elongated emission is pointing towards the center of MSH 11-61A where the pulsar would have been formed, supporting the idea that the Chandra image is of a pulsar wind nebula and its bow shock. Another interesting feature of the Chandra image, also seen with XMM-Newton, is the faint X-ray tail extending to the top-right. The cause of this feature is unknown, but similar tails have been seen from other pulsars that also do not line up with the pulsar's direction of motion.
Based on earlier observations, astronomers estimate that the age of MSH 11-61A is approximately 15,000 years, and it lies at a distance of about 30,000 light years away from Earth. Combining these values with the distance that the pulsar has appeared to have traveled from the center of the MSH 11-61A, astronomers estimate that IGR J11014 is moving at a speed between 5.4 million and 6.5 million miles per hour.
The only other neutron star associated with a supernova remnant that may rival this in speed is the candidate found in the supernova remnant known as G350.1-0.3. The speed of the neutron star candidate in this system is estimated to lie between 3 and 6 million miles per hour (http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2012/g350/).
The high speeds estimated for both IGR J11014 and the neutron star candidate in G350.1-0.3 are preliminary and need to be confirmed. If they are confirmed, explaining the high speeds of the neutron star presents a severe challenge to existing models for supernova explosions.
One important caveat in the conclusion that IGR J11014 may be the fastest moving pulsar is that pulsations have not been detected in it during a search with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Parkes radio telescope. This non-detection is not surprising for a pulsar located about 30,000 light years away.
However, there are other pieces of evidence that support the pulsar interpretation. First, the lack of detection of a counterpart to the X-ray source in optical or infrared images supports the idea that it is a pulsar, since such objects are very faint at these wavelengths. Also, there are no apparent differences in the brightness of the source between XMM-Newton observations in 2003 and the Chandra observations in 2011, behavior that is expected if IGR J11014 is a pulsar. Finally, the X-ray spectrum of the source, that is, its signature in energy, is similar to what astronomers expect to see for a pulsar.
###
These results were published in the May 10, 2012 issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters. The authors were John Tomsick and Arash Bodaghee (University of California, Berkeley), Jerome Rodriguez and Sylvain Chaty (University of Paris, CEA Saclay), Fernando Camilo (Columbia University), Francesca Fornasini (UC Berkeley), and Farhid Rahoui (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics).
NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., manages the Chandra program for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory controls Chandra's science and flight operations from Cambridge, Mass.
[ | E-mail | Share ]
?
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
In this New York Bookwoman ?Legally Speaking? column, Dina Di Maio discusses the importance of a clearly defined contract when co-authoring a work.
Yes! I know an author who co-wrote a work and constantly polices it because the other author claims sole ownership and uses it without her permission. It is essential if you are undertaking a collaborative work that you create a collaboration agreement. Even if you and your friend work well together and have a great writing partnership, when it comes to ownership, control, and finances, conflict is bound to arise without clearly defined terms.
There are many things you want to consider in a collaboration agreement. The first is ownership. Under U.S. copyright law, ?a work prepared by two or more authors with the intention that their contributions be merged into inseparable or interdependent parts of a unitary whole? is a joint work. Copyright ownership exists the moment the two authors create the work. However, a collaboration agreement shows ownership of the work and allows parties to divide ownership any way they want. You also want to stipulate who has control over what happens to the book ? who makes artistic decisions. In addition, you want to establish how an advance and royalties will be split. They don?t have to be split evenly. Also, you want to be clear about how the work will be credited ? whose name will be first, will the names be in different sizes, etc. A non-competition clause also may be in order, so that no one author will publish a book that competes with this one. You may also want to be specific about warranties and who will be responsible for breaches of contract. Will you be responsible for the whole book or just a portion? It?s best to be specific and detailed about all of these things. Keep in mind, a collaboration agreement is not a publishing contract, and both authors can decide whether to sign a publishing contract jointly or separately. It is best to seek the advice of an attorney who has experience in collaboration agreements.
Dina Di Maio is an attorney licensed in New York and Tennessee. She worked in the legal department of the Authors Guild and is a member-at-large. She has written/edited for Family Circle, Scholastic, Vault.com, Glamour, Time Out New York, and more. She lives in Manhattan and writes about food on her food blog: www.huntingfortheverybest.wordpress.com.
*This is legal information only. For legal advice on your specific situation, please see an attorney.
Like this:
Be the first to like this.
Posted in Legally Speaking | Tagged Dina Di Maio, Legally Speaking, New York Bookwoman, newsletter, co-authoring, contract, collaboration agreement, copyright | Leave a Comment
![[ Back to EurekAlert! ]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_u3LaoyEV1vF2rhHdiwx6l04w-skWjc826aBtmFr7KqxpyEKZE8fp4yszaAQGjg0-lR0f6X1FNQLF7etbZ8SxgPjwNJAZ9K_6VFe-ko61M=s0-d){kind=small}
Public release date: 28-Jun-2012
Share ]